A
Aviator.com.lv

Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

This page explains how content on Aviator.com.lv is produced, reviewed, and maintained. We hold ourselves to a clear set of standards so that every reader - whether they are new to crash games or an experienced player - can rely on what they find here.

How We Create Content

Every article, guide, and review published on this site begins with primary research. Our writers consult official provider documentation, game developer release notes, and verified operator terms before drafting a single sentence. We do not summarise other affiliate sites or repurpose press releases without independent verification.

Content follows a structured workflow. A writer produces a first draft, a specialist editor checks it for accuracy and readability, and a senior editor signs off before publication. Factual claims - RTP figures, volatility ratings, minimum bet limits, bonus percentages, wagering requirements - must be sourced to a primary document. If a figure cannot be confirmed, it is omitted rather than estimated.

We cover one subject per page. A guide to Aviator strategies does not double as a bonus roundup; a casino review does not wander into unrelated game mechanics. This keeps information focused and easy to scan.

Fact-Checking Process

Accuracy is not a courtesy - it is the baseline requirement. Our fact-checking process includes the following steps:

When a fact changes after publication - a bonus term is updated, a licence lapses, a game is discontinued - the relevant section is revised and the amendment is noted with a revised date.

Affiliate Relationship Disclosure

Aviator.com.lv earns revenue through affiliate partnerships with licensed online casino operators. When a reader clicks a casino link or a call-to-action button and subsequently registers or deposits, we may receive a commission. This is how the site funds its editorial work.

Affiliate income does not influence which operators appear in our rankings or what is written about them. Casinos are evaluated on licence status, game availability, payment processing speed, customer support quality, and bonus value. An operator that pays a higher commission rate does not receive a higher ranking as a result. We have rejected partnership offers from operators we consider unsuitable for our audience and have written critical findings about partners when the evidence warranted it.

Sponsored or promoted placements, when they occur, are labelled clearly at the top of the relevant section. A reader will never need to guess whether a recommendation is editorial or paid.

Update Frequency and Content Freshness

Game guides are reviewed on a rolling twelve-month cycle or sooner if a material change occurs - such as a provider update, a rule modification, or a significant shift in available markets. Casino reviews are updated whenever we detect a change in licence status, bonus terms, or withdrawal conditions.

Each page carries a "Last updated" date so readers know exactly when the content was last verified. Pages without this date are either brand-new or in the process of being scheduled for review.

We do not leave outdated content live without a notice. If a casino closes, a bonus expires, or a game is removed from the market, the affected page is either updated immediately or marked with a visible warning until a full revision is complete.

Corrections Policy

If we publish incorrect information, we correct it promptly and transparently. Corrections are noted inline with the text using a dated amendment note - we do not silently overwrite errors as if they never occurred.

Readers who spot a factual mistake are encouraged to contact us via the address on our contact page. We aim to acknowledge reports within two business days and publish any warranted correction within five. We do not require the submitter to be an industry professional; a screenshot of the original source is sufficient for us to investigate.

Author Independence

Writers and editors at Aviator.com.lv are not directed by casino marketing teams, game developers, or affiliate managers when producing editorial content. No operator has approval rights over copy before it is published. No partnership agreement includes a clause requiring favourable coverage.

Authors are identified by name and professional background on every article. Where a writer holds a personal account with a casino they review, this is disclosed in the review. Gifted accounts, free credits, or other incentives received for review purposes are disclosed in the same way.

Our editorial team operates independently of the commercial team. Revenue targets and partnership relationships are not shared with writers during the drafting process. If a commercial decision is ever found to have compromised an editorial position, the content is revised and the incident is noted in our internal review log.

Questions About This Policy

If you have questions about how a specific piece of content was produced, or if you believe something on this site requires correction, please reach out through our contact page. We read every message and take editorial accountability seriously.